LicenseGuard

Elastic License 2.0

Elastic-2.0 · Source available (not OSI-approved)

Not OSI-approved. Permits broad use but explicitly forbids offering the software as a hosted or managed service to third parties, and forbids circumventing license key functionality.

What Elastic-2.0 requires, by how you ship

The same license produces different obligations depending on whether the software is distributed, hosted, or kept internal. This is the distinction most dependency scanners collapse.

How you ship itResultWhy
Hosted SaaS Needs review Elastic-2.0 is not an OSI-approved open source license. Licenses in this family commonly restrict offering the software as a commercial or competing service. The specific terms need individual review.
Distributed binary / app Needs review Elastic-2.0 is not an OSI-approved open source license. Licenses in this family commonly restrict offering the software as a commercial or competing service. The specific terms need individual review.
Delivered to customer Needs review Elastic-2.0 is not an OSI-approved open source license. Licenses in this family commonly restrict offering the software as a commercial or competing service. The specific terms need individual review.
Internal use only Needs review Elastic-2.0 is not an OSI-approved open source license. Licenses in this family commonly restrict offering the software as a commercial or competing service. The specific terms need individual review.
Published library Needs review Elastic-2.0 is not an OSI-approved open source license. Licenses in this family commonly restrict offering the software as a commercial or competing service. The specific terms need individual review.

Obligations at a glance

None

As a build-time dependency it is a different question.

Elastic-2.0 appears as a dev dependency, so it is not part of the artifact you ship. Distribution-triggered obligations do not arise. Tools that emit code into your output, such as code generators, are a separate case worth checking individually.

Want to know whether anything in your project is under Elastic-2.0?

Check your whole manifest →

Other licenses

MITPermissiveApache-2.0PermissiveBSD-3-ClausePermissiveBSD-2-ClausePermissiveISCPermissiveGPL-2.0-onlyStrong copyleftGPL-3.0-onlyStrong copyleftLGPL-2.1-onlyLibrary-level copyleftLGPL-3.0-onlyLibrary-level copyleftAGPL-3.0-onlyNetwork copyleftMPL-2.0File-level copyleftEPL-2.0File-level copyleft

See all licenses →

LicenseGuard reports information derived from published license texts and dependency manifests. It is not legal advice and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Results reflect license metadata as declared; they do not identify every obligation or violation. Consult qualified counsel for decisions that matter.