@eslint/config-array safe for commercial use?npm package · License: Apache-2.0
@eslint/config-array is licensed under Apache-2.0, which imposes no source-disclosure obligation in any of the shipping models below.
| How you ship it | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Hosted SaaS | No obligation | Apache-2.0 section 4 requires retaining copyright notices, a copy of the license, and any NOTICE file. Section 3 grants a patent license from contributors. There is no source-disclosure obligation. |
| Distributed binary / app | No obligation | Apache-2.0 section 4 requires retaining copyright notices, a copy of the license, and any NOTICE file. Section 3 grants a patent license from contributors. There is no source-disclosure obligation. |
| Delivered to customer | No obligation | Apache-2.0 section 4 requires retaining copyright notices, a copy of the license, and any NOTICE file. Section 3 grants a patent license from contributors. There is no source-disclosure obligation. |
| Internal use only | No obligation | Apache-2.0 section 4 requires retaining copyright notices, a copy of the license, and any NOTICE file. Section 3 grants a patent license from contributors. There is no source-disclosure obligation. |
| Published library | No obligation | Apache-2.0 section 4 requires retaining copyright notices, a copy of the license, and any NOTICE file. Section 3 grants a patent license from contributors. There is no source-disclosure obligation. |
AttributionNOTICE filePatent grant
If you only use it at build time, the answer changes.
Apache-2.0 appears as a dev dependency, so it is not part of the artifact you ship. Distribution-triggered obligations do not arise. Tools that emit code into your output, such as code generators, are a separate case worth checking individually.
Permissive, but with two things MIT lacks: an explicit patent grant from contributors, and a requirement to carry forward any NOTICE file. Companies wary of patent exposure often prefer it over MIT for that reason.
This page covers one package. Your package-lock.json has many more.
Check your whole manifest →The license was read from the npm registry, then evaluated against each shipping model. Only the declared license is considered; code copied into a project's own source files is not detected by this method.
LicenseGuard reports information derived from published license texts and dependency manifests. It is not legal advice and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Results reflect license metadata as declared; they do not identify every obligation or violation. Consult qualified counsel for decisions that matter.