backports-zstd safe for commercial use?PyPI package · License: PSF-2.0
backports-zstd is licensed under PSF-2.0, which imposes no source-disclosure obligation in any of the shipping models below.
| How you ship it | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Hosted SaaS | Needs review | PSF-2.0 does not match a known license identifier. The license text needs individual review. |
| Distributed binary / app | Needs review | PSF-2.0 does not match a known license identifier. The license text needs individual review. |
| Delivered to customer | Needs review | PSF-2.0 does not match a known license identifier. The license text needs individual review. |
| Internal use only | Needs review | PSF-2.0 does not match a known license identifier. The license text needs individual review. |
| Published library | Needs review | PSF-2.0 does not match a known license identifier. The license text needs individual review. |
None
If you only use it at build time, the answer changes.
PSF-2.0 appears as a dev dependency, so it is not part of the artifact you ship. Distribution-triggered obligations do not arise. Tools that emit code into your output, such as code generators, are a separate case worth checking individually.
This page covers one package. Your requirements.txt has many more.
Check your whole manifest →The license was read from the PyPI registry, then evaluated against each shipping model. Only the declared license is considered; code copied into a project's own source files is not detected by this method.
LicenseGuard reports information derived from published license texts and dependency manifests. It is not legal advice and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Results reflect license metadata as declared; they do not identify every obligation or violation. Consult qualified counsel for decisions that matter.